Amelia Earhart: What The General Public Never Knew

Home Page: Amelia Earhart
About Tod Swindell
Drumming Out False Earhart History
The Curious Mrs. Irene O'Crowley Craigmile-Bolam
Past Significant Amelia Earhart Disappearance Investigations
About 'Operation Earhart' (1960-1970)
The 1980s and 1990s Words Of Monsignor James Francis Kelley On Amelia Earhart
Comparing Amelia Earhart To Irene O'Crowley Craigmile (Surname 'Bolam' added in 1958)
Wikipedia Deceitfully Misleads the Public About Amelia and Irene
Newspaper Fraud Tried To Hide The Truth In 1982

 

Thanks To A Forensic Study, The Truth Pertaining To What Became Of Amelia Earhart Is Now Plain To See:

 

  

1AAAerelax2.jpg

Amelia Earhart

 
 

00000000000aaa10A1B.jpg

Digital Composite

 
 
 
 
-

1AAIjamesberg3.jpg

The post-1940 only Irene.
[There was more than one
Irene O'Crowley Craigmile.]

ZZZZZZIOC2ABC1ABC.jpg

Irene O'Crowley Craigmile was a Twentieth Century person who had known Amelia Earhart. The individual shown above in 1977, was only identified as Irene O'Crowley Craigmile from the 1940s on because she was not the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile.
 
New research confirmed that the person above did not appear anywhere as "Irene" prior to the 1940s.
 
 
As well, the results issued by a forensic comparison analysis have now made the former identity of the post-1940 only Irene displayed above, easy to recognize:
 

1AAG1compA.jpg

1

In 1965, it was first suspected that the distinguished looking person who was known as Irene O'Crowley Craigmile from the 1940s on, had previously gone by the name of Amelia Earhart.
 
In 1970, she was publicly accused of being the former Amelia Earhart, yet she denied it within the context of a national news story and people were quick to believe her.
  
At the time, few bothered to evaluate the full basis of the accusation, nor did it register to anyone that the question that asked if the post-1940 only Irene was or wasn't the once world famous pilot going by a different name, somehow missed being forensically addressed.
 
Keep going to learn more about the relentless foundation of this story, that was endlessly scorned by pseudo historians, whom in turn influenced American pop-culture to not take the Amelia became known as Irene truth seriously for half a century.

1

aaagoerner.jpg

1966 by Fred Goerner

aaaaklassbook23.jpg

1970, The Joe Klaas book about the Gervais,
Dinger, and Briand ten year investigation
known as: 'Operation Earhart'

000001AbrinkLS.jpg

1994, by Randall Brink, updated
the previous work of Fred Goerner
and Operation Earhart 
 

AAmyers3.jpg

1985

017.JPG

2004

Jameson.jpg

2016
 
 

 
Regarding the six books displayed above:

0000000oak.jpeg

Hello. My name is Tod Swindell. I'm a less than well-known artist, writer, and filmmaker who in the 1990s, began looking into Amelia Earhart's all but forgotten, missing person case.
 
It is now 2021, and for the past several years the results of a research and comparison study that I orchestrated to test a decades-old, never disproved assertion about Amelia Earhart, managed to consume my interest.
 
The reason I called for the study was simple: No one had done such a thing before, and I wanted to forensically ascertain if it was actually true that Amelia Earhart survived her 1937 disappearance and lived to become known as Irene. This was largely because of the six books displayed above. Four of them concluded that Amelia lived to become known as Irene, while the other two that were published in 1966 and 1994, concluded that Amelia did live well past the date of her storied disappearance, except they did not mention the name of 'Irene.'
 
The final two books, Rollin Reineck's and W.C. Jameson's, referenced my in-progress forensic study and agreed that its preliminary findings were correct where they evidenced that Amelia did become known as Irene.
 
Colonel Rollin Reineck, was a person I befriended along the way. He had studied Amelia Earhart's disappearance for many years and already attested that she survived and went on to become known as Irene. In 2003, Rollin was impressed by some of the initial study results I had achieved with help and guidance from Dr. Walter S. Birkby, a noted forensic anthropologist. So much so, it inspired him to write his book, Amelia Earhart Survived. Rollin credited my study in his book for, "making it plane for the world to see" that Amelia did become known as Irene. Myself and Dr. Birkby tried to talk Rollin out of going forward with his book, though, because the study had a ways to go before it would be finalized for public review. No matter, Rollin was a World War Two flying hero who was getting old, and he wanted to make sure that he left behind his version of Amelia Earhart's disappearance and her later incognito return to the United States. (Colonel Reineck died in 2007.) W. C. Jameson, on the other hand, derided my efforts. Although he agreed that Amelia became known as Irene, he wrote of my study, that I had just submitted for copyright when his book came out in 2016, that it did nothing to influence his opinion. I believe that wasn't true. The Associated Press had written about my work, some of it was displayed on the National Geographic Channel in 2006, and elements of it had been viewable over the internet for several years before his book came out. I'll add that until I embarked on the study, the old Amelia became known as Irene assertion had been dormant for decades. 
 
I never met author Robert Meyers, who came to know the former Amelia Earhart and averred that she confided in him about her true past. 
 
Through author Randall Brink, I did meet and become good friends with another World War Two flying hero, one Joseph A. Gervais, during the last decade of his life. Joe's ten year investigation in the 1960s known as "Operation Earhart" had inspired the 1970 book, Amelia Earhart Lives by Joe Klaas. Joe Gervais was the original person to meet and (somewhat candidly) photograph the former Amelia Earhart, at a 1965 gathering of retired pilots in New York. It was there, to his own astonishment, that he instantly recognized who she used to be through her post-1940 Irene veil. She rebuffed him, though, after she cited factual errata in the book, Amelia Earhart Lives, that had attempted to out her. Joseph A. Gervais became a subject of ridicule after that, but he never stopped insisting that she was the former Amelia Earhart, all the way to his dying day in 2005. Now, thanks to a lot of hard work done by myself and others, a lot more about the Amelia-to-Irene truth is known.
 
By the way, all of those other stories you've heard about Amelia; that her bones were found on a desert island; that she was captured by Japan and executed for spying on its military installations; or that with hours of fuel remaining she aimlessly flew on until her tanks ran dry -- thus causing her to spiral down into the sea; they were all false claims issued by people who saw a way to financially capitalize on the so-called "mystery" of Amelia's disappearance.
 
The wikipedia page that states the Amelia became known as Irene assertion was debunked in 2006, is also false there, not to mention misleading in other ways. 
 
The path of truth you're on here, however, continues below. 
 

 
 

1abeevi2.jpg

This old and grainy photograph from 1932, listed
Amelia climbing on the wing, Jack Warren in the
rear pilot seat, and the original Irene O'Crowley
Craigmile & Viola Gentry standing. The plane had
just recently been purchased by the original Irene.
Jack Warren, Viola's beau, was one of the original
Irene's early flying  instructors. Viola Gentry, a
famous pilot herself and a good friend of Amelia's
would become a key figure in the Amelia-Irene story.
Below is a 1932 photo of Amelia and Viola together,
taken when Amelia returned from soloing the Atlantic.
 

1AAelinorAAA.jpg
AMELIA EARHART AND VIOLA GENTRY, 1932

1

1AAAbeechnut2.jpg

Above, Amelia Earhart in 1931, next to a Pitcairn
Autogyro she flew sponsored by Beech Nut Gum 
  

 
From the 'digital comparisons' section of a forensic research analysis that deeply examined the life stories of three 1930s' flying pals, Amelia Earhart, Viola Gentry, and Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, the post-1940 only Irene's image and Amelia's image are shown together here in another digital composite: 

0001AE2compBCD.jpg

Amelia Earhart in 1937...

-

AAAAustin1.jpg

begins to...
 

AAAAustin2.jpg

digitally transition into...
 

AAA36compCA.jpg

...the post-1940 Irene in 1965
 

The comprehensive Amelia Earhart and Irene O'Crowley Craigmile forensic research study and comparison analysis not only surfaced the reality of more than one Twentieth Century person having been attributed to the same, Irene O'Crowley Craigmile identity; it also left no doubt that the post-1940 only Irene O'Crowley Craigmile was previously known as, Amelia Earhart. Keep going to learn more about this recently affirmed, and now wholesomely presented finality. 
 

The photo below was taken by retired Air
Force Major Joseph A. Gervais in 1965. By
then, Amelia had been gone for 28 years and
was no longer current in the public mindset.
Between the new hair and dress styles, and the
slight weight gain, it was hard to recognize her:

JOSEPH A. GERVAIS PHOTO, 1965
1AAgervaispic52.jpg

This photo of the post-1940 only Irene was taken in East Hampton, New York.
After she married Guy Bolam of England in 1958, she became known as Irene Bolam.
The forensic study learned that she appeared nowhere identified as 'Irene' prior to the 1940s.
She did not emerge from out of nowhere, rather, she used to be known as Amelia Earhart.
 
When she was challenged about her past in 1970, the post-1940 only Irene declined to admit who she used to be, choosing instead to adhere to her later-life assumed identity. Her following newspaper quotes from that year verified her denial: 

00001anosediveC.jpg

00001anosediveBB.jpg

In November of 1970, a new book titled, Amelia Earhart Lives caused quite a stir when it asserted that [the post-1940 only] Irene O'Crowley Craigmile Bolam, was actually the still-living Amelia Earhart, sporting a different identity. The press had a field day with it. Below are a few comments made by the flustered Mrs. Bolam to some reporters the day before she held a news conference -- to deny the book's allegation that suggested she was the former Amelia Earhart -- even though Amelia Earhart indeed was who she used to be.

1AAAFriend.jpg
1AAAfriend2.jpg
1AAAfriend3.jpg

After Amelia Earhart Lives was published, as noted above, Mrs. Irene Bolam told the press that her maiden name had been Irene O'Crowley, but when she earned her pilot's license in 1933, she was known as, Irene Craigmile
 
Amelia Earhart's sister, Muriel Earhart Morrissey, acknowledged in 1970 that she had "known" Mrs. Bolam for many years, but insisted she was not her sister, Amelia, adding how Mrs. Bolam demonstrated, "practically no physical resemblance" to Amelia. [The recent study results revealed that Muriel, who died in 1998, was obviously incorrect with her "no physical resemblance" comment. It is certain anymore that Muriel was instrumental in helping to obscure the truth of her sister's ongoing incognito existence as Irene.] 
 

 

AAAEpidge2.jpg

Amelia's sister, Muriel

Amelia Earhart's only sibling, her sister, Muriel Earhart Morrissey, steadfastly denied that her later-life friend, [the post-1940 only] Irene, was actually her still-living sister, Amelia, going by a different name.

Below, a newspaper article quoted Muriel's negative reaction to the claim about her friend, Irene, that surfaced in the 1970 book, Amelia Earhart Lives
 

1AAAAmurielquote3.jpg

 

Not long before Muriel died in 1998, a contingency of Earhart researchers became aware of the fact that the 'Amelia became known as Irene' claim was never really officially settled. In response to their rekindled pursuit of the controversy, Muriel once again decried the effort. Here she is quoted again:

 

1AAAAoutland3.jpg

Note: The "women's club" that Muriel mentioned she and Mrs. Bolam had both belonged to was the International Zonta Club of professional career women. As shown in the clipping below that referred to the post-1940 only Irene, it was not until after World War Two that the post-1940 only Irene joined the Zontas. (Muriel as well, did not become a Zonta member until after World War Two.) When she was Amelia, however, she joined the Zonta's right after she became famous in 1928, and her Zonta membership was still active when she went missing in 1937. The original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, (who further down is shown and written about) wasn't a career woman and was never a Zonta member. She also did not become a member of any flying clubs in the 1930s, per the brevity of her days as a pilot. The following clipping, however, describes a few impressive exploits of the post-1940 only Irene that exclusively took place after World War Two:
 

1AAAAIB784.jpg

Few people recall that Amelia Earhart was an extremely intelligent person with good business acumen, and that she also spoke several languages. This left her well suited to become a Zonta International Relations chairperson in her later-life years when she was known as Irene. Of note, that same 'International Relations' position was previously filled by the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile's aunt, a well known New York and New Jersey attorney by the name of, Irene Rutherford O'Crowley. Attorney Irene was a Zonta charter member who Amelia met and looked up to after she herself joined Zonta. It was Irene Rutherford O'Crowley who introduced her niece, the original Irene, to Amelia. The linchpin of Attorney Irene Rutherford O'Crowley having brought her niece's desire to become a pilot to Amelia's attention in 1932, also surfaced in the research portion of the analysis. 

 

Below, throughout her adult life, the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile's aunt, Attorney Irene Rutherford O'Crowley, was often featured in newspaper stories that covered her various attainments. The story on the left ran in 1928, the year she met Amelia Earhart. The story on the right ran in 1963. Note: Attorney Irene Rutherford O'Crowley played a pivotal role in keeping her niece's identity 'alive' for Amelia to use from the 1940s on. Attorney Irene and her mother, Sarah, had raised the original Irene from age twelve on. 

0000001IROCAA.jpg

AAIRC1.jpg

It's of little surprise, really, that when the post-1940 only Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, AKA the former Amelia Earhart, faced the press in 1970, Attorney Irene Rutherford O'Crowley was still very much alive at the time, but she was not sought for comment and she issued no statement.

 


 
Meet the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile:

 

The original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, who Amelia Earhart knew and had flown with in the early 1930s, looked nothing like Amelia:

ZZAACJICRJOC4A1A.jpg

AAAorigirene4.jpg

This 1930 dated newspaper photo features the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, shown
between her husband, Charles James Craigmile (left) and her father, Richard Joseph O'Crowley.

Tragedy struck the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile's life in 1931, when her husband of three years, Charles James Craigmile, suddenly died:

1931

00001ACJcraigABC.jpg

00001ACJcraigAAAA.jpg

After her husband died, the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile decided to become a pilot. With Amelia's and Viola Gentry's encouragement, she purchased a plane in 1932, and she earned her wings in 1933. In fact, she was a pretty good pilot for awhile, and through Amelia and Viola she befriended the small, elite group of lady fliers that flew out of Long Island, New York's Roosevelt and Floyd Bennett Airfields. She also moved to Brooklyn from New Jersey. 
 

023OI.JPG

An old newspaper photo of the
original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile,
shown next to her plane in 1933.
 

000001craigfuneral1933.jpg
MAY 1933

It was no small feat for any pilot in 1933,
to fly a single engine, two-seater plane to
Chicago from Long Island, New York.

 

In 1967, an elderly, retired pilot by the name of Elmo Pickerill, recalled the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile from the early 1930s, in the following manner:

AAApickerill7.jpg

AAA36xpickerill5.jpg

Strangely, approximate to when Amelia Earhart went 'missing' in the late 1930s, the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile as well, was no longer evident. In time, clear photo evidence of the original Irene had also been removed from circulation.
 
Whatever became of the original Irene is not publicly known, but it is certain anymore that Amelia Earhart had continued to live-on after she was declared missing during the pre-dawn era of World War Two, and in due-time she was able to assume the original Irene's leftover identity for herself to use... for the remainder of her days.
 
Any further, this reality of what became of Amelia Earhart after she went missing in 1937, exists as an obvious truth to behold. The accumulated over time forensic research evidence that supports it is non-contestable. 
 

[See more digital comparisons further down.]
 

 
"The forensic studies are very convincing. She was not an ordinary housewife as she claimed. She was influential, knew many well placed people and was well traveled." From an Associated Press article by Ron Staton, John Bolam refers to early results from the 21st Century Amelia-to-Irene forensic comparison analysis orchestrated by Tod Swindell. John Bolam was the generation younger brother of the post-1940 only Irene's British husband, Guy BolamHe died in 2008, not long after making the above statement. 
 

"All one has to do is realize that the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile was a real person who knew Amelia Earhart in the 1930s -- but that she did not look like Amelia -- while understanding at the same time how the post-1940 only Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, proved to be congruent to Amelia Earhart in a head-to-toe manner, and the truth suddenly reveals itself." Tod Swindell 

 
How The 'Irene' Controversy Originally Surfaced:-

-

aaaaklassbook23.jpg

ZZZZZZIOC2ABC1ABC.jpg

The 1970 book, Amelia Earhart Lives, by Joe Klaas, focused on the results of 'Operation Earhart', a ten-year investigation of Amelia's 1937 disappearance -- that concluded by boldly asserting the post-1940 only Irene O'Crowley Craigmile (later, 'Bolam'), shown above next to the book, had previously been known as, Amelia Earhart.

The post-1940 only Irene was blindsided by Amelia Earhart Lives, and she was quick to denounced it. People ended up making fun of Operation Earhart's assertion about her as well, after she deliberately convinced the curious it was outlandish to even suggest that her long ago friend, Amelia Earhart, somehow survived her 1937 disappearance and went on to be known by another name.
 
I have studied this issue for a long time and I am here to inform all that anymore, mocking the simple notion of Amelia Earhart continuing to live-on after she was declared missing, and later opting to change her name, is no longer judicious. To be sure, it never was judicious. The idea of Amelia Earhart changing her name, especially after experiencing whatever she endured during her war-time period of absence, was never as far-fetched as some individuals made it out to be, nor was it an outlandish suggestion, especially given all that was left unknown about her world flight outcome.
 
Hindsight now shows that Amelia's survival and name change to Irene was not only true, but it was the product of a well thought out endeavor, the end result of which, that of Amelia Earhart veritably replacing the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, was a reality that was never supposed to be known by the general public, and nobody knew that better than the former Amelia Earhart herself.
 
In 1970, the book Amelia Earhart Lives apparently did catch the living, former Amelia Earhart off guard. When it did, she saw no other choice but to deny her true past in order to preserve her privacy, and no doubt as well, to avoid causing much confusion and conflict, that admitting who she used to be surely would have done. Anymore it is completely evident, though, that beyond a variety of reckless suppositions the book, Amelia Earhart Lives presented, that enabled the former Amelia to pick it apart, it was still correct where it asserted that Amelia Earhart survived her disappearance, and lived to become known as, 'Irene.' Tod Swindell
 

-

AAAAAAnov70confA.jpg

Above: The former Amelia Earhart faces the press in 1970. She denounced the contents of the book, Amelia Earhart Lives, denied her true past, and people believed her. Amazingly, however, no one back then thought to compare her to Amelia. Decades later, researcher Tod Swindell's study of Amelia's life story became the first such effort to include an Amelia to Irene, forensic comparison analysis.

000000001AEprof.jpg

Amelia Earhart
 
 

 -

000000000IAoverlayA77AA.jpg

Digital Composite
 
 

00000001IBpressa2AA.jpg

The former Amelia as 'Irene' 

1AAGIprofile2.jpg

ZZZZZZIOC2ABC1ABC.jpg

-

Again, the post-1940 only Irene O'Crowley
Craigmile looked nothing like the original Irene
O'Crowley Craigmile, because she used
to be known as, Amelia Earhart.

 

1AAG1compA.jpg

Above is another digital composite of Amelia Earhart and
the post-1940 only Irene O'Crowley Craigmile (Bolam),
from the first-ever 'Amelia versus Irene' comparison
analysis. [The study issued many comparisons.]
 

1AAshirleyA.jpg

Above, the cover of Shirley Dobson Gilroy's classic 1985,
"artistic tribute to Amelia Earhart" book, Amelia / Pilot In Pearls
 

 

It's Over...-

 

The results of a long-term, comprehensive forensic research analysis that studied Amelia Earhart's life story and her 1937 disappearance and missing person case in a revolutionary kind of way are presented here, and they display the veritable truth pertaining to what became of Amelia after she went missing.

Amelia Earhart aficionados were already familiar with the unresolved, Amelia/Irene controversy from the 1970s. The analysis results confirmed that the top of the page photo portrait shows the former Amelia Earhart in 1977, who lived the remainder of her days in the United States with the identity of Irene O'Crowley Craigmile applied to her person. It now exists as a forensic reality, that from the 1940s on, the former Amelia Earhart was known as, Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, until 1958, when she married Guy Bolam, of England, that updated her name to, Irene O'Crowley Craigmile Bolam. [From 1958 on she was more commonly known as, "Mrs. Irene Bolam" or "Mrs. Guy Bolam".]

Amelia Earhart knew and had flown with the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile in the early 1930s. After the original Irene endured a tough decade, though, by the late 1930s she no longer appeared. You will find out more about the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile as you continue reviewing the analysis results displayed here. You will also further ascertain for yourself how from the 1940s on, even though the person featured in the top portrait photo was legally known as Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, (and later, 'Bolam') she definitely was not the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile. Rather, she was the former Amelia Earhart, according to the forensic research discoveries and comparison results the analysis delivered.

-

000-aaic.jpg

Amelia Earhart in 1937, right before she
purportedly, disappeared without a trace.
~~~
 

  

 
If you cannot fathom the truth about what became of Amelia Earhart by way of the analysis results displayed here, it is most likely because your care worn Earhart soul won't permit you to. Your chance to recognize the truth about Amelia, though, is by being considerate to what my in-depth analysis discovered about her, as opposed to dismissing it all out of hand. The people who have been Earhart educated in misleading directions will likely influence you in a 'don't believe what you see here' kind of way, as will stodgy historians that will tell you to disregard the now plain to observe reality that shows what became of Amelia Earhart after she went missing.
 
Notwithstanding the number of false Earhart platitudes out there -- that conflicts a person's ability to maintain a sense of proportion about Amelia Earhart -- it is your right, if you wish to keep learning about the truth, to continue on here. Tod Swindell, 2021
 

  

 
A Note About A Person's Looks
 
Throughout her famous career, Amelia Earhart demonstrated a variety of looks. Below left is the same photo of her taken during her 1937 world flight, just before she went missing. Yet, when compared to the 1932 photograph in the center and the 1928 far right photos, it's not so easy to recognize that they all display the same person. [Food for thought when comparing individuals and their different looks.]
 

-

000-aaic.jpg

-

-

Amelia-Earhart-Cross-of-Knight-French-Legion-1932.jpg

-

-

amelia-earhart-saluting-veterans-world-war-one-front3.jpg

amelia-earhart-close-up-portrait-after-1928-transatlantic-flight-front.jpg

-

 
Below, all Amelia...

0000000000000mPPib08B.jpg

1AAAEeuroC.jpg

00000ae.jpg

-

~~~
The Origin Of The Now Recognizable
Truth About Amelia Earhart
 
Few recall the contentious, never resolved story from 1970, about an assertion that stated Amelia Earhart continued to survive after she was declared missing in 1937and how she was later discovered in the U.S. living under an assumed identity:
 

November of 1970 Headlines:

1AAhint2.jpg

aechanged4.jpg

 
The University of Texas at Dallas, that houses a special collection of U.S. aviation historical research, recently cited that Amelia's survival in the described manner above was plausible given the amount of credible evidence that supported it. Keep going to find out why, and what more results from the new, comprehensive analysis learned about the shared Twentieth Century identity of, Irene O'Crowley Craigmile (Bolam).
 
Note: Wikipedia's "Irene Craigmile Bolam" page presents a falsified brief about the never resolved 'Amelia became Irene' assertion, where it suggests the Irene identity controversy was settled using known facts about her life, and by way of a forensic detective hired by the National Geographic Society in 2006. The study learned that the National Geographic Society never hired a forensic detective that delivered a final conclusion about Irene's life-long identity, and facts about the original Irene, who had known Amelia in the 1930s, are easy for anyone to trace.
 
It is important to point out that there is no record of any forensically drawn conclusion that stated Amelia Earhart did not live to become known as, 'Irene O'Crowley Craigmile (Bolam)' in her later life years. So wikipedia's page is misleading where it implies such a thing.
 
In the meantime, an overwhelming preponderance of both forensic and circumstantial evidence accumulated in decades gone by indicates that Amelia did live on after she went missing, and at some point, for reasons only she and very few others understood, she assumed the leftover identity of a person she used to know, whose name was Irene O'Crowley Craigmile
  
~~~

According to the forensic analysis results, at some point the post-1940 only Irene assumed the original Irene's leftover identity. As well, also according to the analysis results, there were a total of three different women attributed to the same Irene O'Crowley Craigmile identity, as displayed below. 
 
Note: Clear photo records of the original Irene were removed from circulation long ago. J. Edgar Hoover made sure of it.

   

1

0000001IOC14to20.jpg
1918

AAAorigirene4.jpg
1930

2

origjunior.jpg
1945

AAAAgoodolderIJRAA.jpg
1980

3

ZZZZZZZ46AE.jpg
1946

IB65ABC5.jpg
1965

 
Thanks to the analysis results, it is now fairly easy for one to recognize with a naked eye, that the above younger to older images are those of the three different people who were attributed to the same Twentieth Century identity of Irene O'Crowley Craigmile. Individually they were: 1.) The original Irene. 2.) The surrogate mother Irene, and 3.) The post-1940 only Irene. 
 

-

A Quick Look Back
'The History of the Mystery' 
 
As we enter 2021 after a most trying year, anymore it seems that people are bored with the subject of Amelia Earhart's odd 1937 disappearance. In recent decades, to regenerate public curiosity, a variety of organizations and theorists, (a few shown below; the oldest being TIGHAR and the newest being the 2017 upstart, Chasing Earhart) took to promoting myriad theories to the news media, within their attempts to offer a solution to the 'mystery' cloud that continued to hover over the legendary pilot's fate. Of little surprise, it turned out that none of their varied conclusions were correct.
 
However, another accredited researcher, Tod Swindell, who deftly avoided media adulation, quietly approached Amelia Earhart's disappearance and missing person case forensically. The results of his work are detailed beneath the following once promoted but now discarded theories.
 

-

01-tighar.jpg

 TIGHAR

-

-1-tnauticos.jpg

NAUTICOS

 
-

01-tchasing.jpg

 CHASING EARHART

 

08-rictyDanUKDJughJfO-400x400-noPad.jpg

Richard Gillespie of Tighar,
'learned what happened';
said Amelia flew south of the
Equator to a desert island,
died a castaway, and was
eaten by small land crabs.

-

08-elgenlong.jpg

Elgen Long, of Nauticos,
said he 'solved the mystery':
Claimed Amelia flew in an
uncertain direction after
missing Howland, and she
went down in the ocean at
unknown coordinates.

-

08-mike-in-wichita.jpg

Mike Campbell said he
found, 'the truth at last';
Claimed Amelia died in
captivity within a ruthless
Nippon military culture.

-

000001ARmartiniAA.jpg

Richard Martini of
"Earhart's Electra" felt
he, 'knew the answer';
Amelia was executed
on Saipan by a small
Japanese firing squad.
 

 
Below: The New, 'Paradigm Shift' Alternative
 

-

00000000TS1A.jpg

After decades of intense study, what does Tod Swindell profess to know about Amelia Earhart's old missing person case -- and a forgotten controversy in relationship to it?
 
A lot. 
 
Enough to where the differing conclusions offered by past Amelia Earhart theorists were deemed anachronistic with one long ago, prematurely dismissed exception.
 
Here's why: 
 
A forensic analysis he orchestrated with human identity experts, proved instrumental in discovering never before known realities about an infamous assertion from the 1970s, that stated Amelia Earhart privately lived on for years under an assumed identity after she was declared "missing" in 1937, and "dead in absentia" in 1939.
 
To begin with, until the analysis took place, it was not known that a formidable woman known as, Mrs. Irene Bolam, who in the 1970s had been called-out as the former Amelia Earhart, had a physicality about her that proved to be congruent to Amelia Earhart's physicality. It wasn't known because Mrs. Bolam was never actually compared to Amelia Earhart before the analysis took place. After the analysis did take place, when the results were combined with the additional corroborating information that had previously surfaced, (such as the accounts given by Monsignor Kelley, previewed directly below) it became forensically clear that Amelia did survive and in time became known as Irene. 
 

1AAAmural5.jpg

-

The post-1940 Irene 
(FKA Earhart) dining with
Monsignor Kelley
 

aaakellyirene23.jpg
1978

-

 
"After all she'd been through she didn't want
to be the famous Amelia Earhart anymore."
Monsignor James Francis Kelley, 1987
 

AAkelley2.jpg

Monsignor James Francis
Kelley [1902-1996] held
PhD's in philosophy and
psychology. He admitted to
having counseled Amelia in
the 1940s, and helping with
her identity change as well.
 
 

1AAgertIBAB.jpg

The post-1940 only Irene, (FKA Earhart) above on the right, did not like it when people candidly took her picture. Her expression here appeared to make that abundantly clear. The dark haired gal with the gray streak in the photo was Gertrude Kelley Hession, Monsignor James Francis Kelley's sister, who was a regular 1970s traveling companion of Irene's after Guy Bolam died. This photo was taken in Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, in 1976. (Note the digital composites below.)
 

1AAdubo3.jpg
006.JPG

Ever evasive to the press,
when asked about the identity
controversy that concerned his
friend, Irene, Monsignor Kelley
was quoted in 1982 in the New 
Jersey Tribune this way:

0000000aaaabkelley.jpg

-

Anecdotal information about the post-1940 Irene and her 1970s' friendship with LPGA promoter, Peter Busatti: 

Aabusattirene.jpg

Above: The post-1940 Irene and Peter Busatti, 1978
 

07-AEIMG_1194.jpg

Above left is the post-1940 Irene O'Crowley Craigmile; above center is the post-1940 Irene and Amelia digitally combined; above right is a rare profile photo of Amelia Earhart, taken just before she went missing.

"Peter Busatti said he accompanied Mrs. Bolam to the Wings Club in New York City on one occasion. He said a full length portrait of Amelia Earhart hangs in the room dedicated in her honor. ""It was a dead ringer for Irene,"" he said. ""Sometimes I thought she was [the former Amelia] and sometimes I thought she wasn't. Once when I asked her directly she replied, "When I die you'll find out,"" Busatti said. At a Wings Club event in Washington, Busatti mentioned how, ""All the admirals and generals seemed to know her."" Excerpted from a 1982 New Jersey Tribune article. When interviewed, Peter Busatti openly commented about his suspicion that his friend, the post-1940 Irene O'Crowley Craigmile-Bolam, used to be known as Amelia Earhart.

 

Balloon Rides Anyone?

000000000000BalloonABCD2bA.jpg

The above 'hot air balloon' newspaper photo taken in 1979, features Irene O'Crowley Craigmile-Bolam [FKA 'Amelia'] accompanied by famous golfer, Kathy Whitworth. Especially in the 1970s, after taking over to manage her company's accounts, to include for her main client, Radio Luxembourg, the former Amelia Earhart was simply known as 'Irene Bolam' to friends and associates of hers. In the meantime she had also grown to be respected and admired by important people not only in the United States--but internationally as well. Those who were aware of who she used to be, of course, never talked much about her, such as her friend, Senator Barry Goldwater, who in her later life years she shared her ongoing love of photography with. Senator Goldwater himself was a great pilot who distinguished himself that way in World War Two.

-

ZZZZZZIOC2ABC1ABC.jpg

Anymore, reality states that the woman above was not the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile. Rather, she was known as 'Amelia Earhart' for the first half of her life, and then as 'Irene' for the last half of her life. To not recognize this is to not recognize the truth when it comes to what became of Amelia Earhart after she went missing in 1937.

-

-

-

-

-

 
More from the Orchestrator of the Forensic Analysis

1AAgibson2.jpg

Tod Swindell and 'Gibson' in 2016
 

For clarification, I am not, nor have I ever claimed to be a certified forensic expert, but to learn and better understand forensic comparison applications, I educated myself by reading about them, meeting and consulting with forensic detectives, with forensic anthropologists, with physicians, with a voice comparison specialist, and with a document examiner. Ultimately, by the time I finished my forensic endeavoring, twenty-years of a learning process had transpired as I applied various comparison techniques I became familiarized with to the dated, yet never settled, did Amelia become known as Irene question. 

I began my 'forensic comparison journey' in 1997. I first registered portions of my research at the Writers Guild of America in 1998, then again under the MSS title of Protecting Earhart in 2004, 2008, 2012, & 2016, revising it along the way. I copyrighted my MSS in 2014, and then again in 2017, with the forensic visual elements added to it. I am now in the process of launching a new website platform while producing a trailer for my upcoming documentary, and am preparing my Protecting Earhart MSS for final publication.

Hocus-pocus has never characterized my work, or "hokum", as it was once accused of being by one of Amelia's living relatives. I was never prone to trickery or fraud, or chicanery or frame. I just let the chips fall.

In recent years I have been unfavorably written about in newer Amelia Earhart books. As well, various media outlets, starting with the National Geographic Channel in 2006, took to downplaying my forensic accomplishments. That never bothered me much, really, because it wasn't until 2020, the horrid year of the Covid 19 outbreak, that I finally started to feel I was ready to go public with my epic, Amelia-to-Irene forensic journey... and the full results it achieved. This included its discovery of the unrealized fact that three Twentieth Century women were attributed to the same 'Irene' identity, with the post-1940 only Irene being the one who matched Amelia. I suppose that amid the fog of 2020, I decided it might provide a good, and possibly enlightening public distraction to come forward with this new information.

I attest that my efforts handily display a forensic reality about Amelia Earhart, pertaining to a truth about her that has been ignored ever since it first surfaced five decades ago.

That's right. In 1970, our national news media alerted our country of this very same truth about Amelia's post-loss survival as Irene, only to see it be categorically shouted-down without being disproved. [Note: A self proclaimed Earhart fanatic, Dr. Alex Mandel of Ukraine, outright fabricated in his 2007 posted, "Irene Craigmile Bolam" wikipedia page, where he wrote that the Irene in question's 'life history' was, "thoroughly documented, eliminating any possibility she was Earhart," and that a Nat Geo forensic detective "concluded" that the 'Amelia became known as Irene' postulation was false. Trust knowing, Dr. Mandel marshaled some loose information that he twisted into lies there.] 

If you cannot fathom the truth about what became of Amelia Earhart by way of my work, again it is most likely because your care worn Earhart soul disallows you to. Your best chance to recognize it, though, is by giving serious consideration to my analysis results instead of dismissing them all out of hand, as less Earhart-educated individuals will influence you to, or people who simply wish to leave the now observable reality about Amelia, alone. It's up to you.

Otherwise, my own reward of truth came by way of the incredible journey I traveled to get to it. 

For what it's worth, I am thankful for choosing the path less chosen when I came to my Amelia Earhart fork in the road, for it did make all the differenceTod Swindell - 2021

 

"The journey is the reward." Tao

 


~~~ 

prescon3.jpg

-

Review:
Mrs. Bolam's Press Conference

IBsuper.jpg

-

presscon.jpg

Caught off guard, but wielding a strong and certain voice, Mrs. Bolam stood alone while reading a statement prepared by her attorney. She admonished the assertion that said she was really Amelia Earhart, then held her ground while briefly answering a few questions. She concluded by strongly denouncing the book, Amelia Earhart Lives, and left the room. Except, the story about her true past was far from over.
 

-

Continuing on...
 
It turned out that the fairly enigmatic, Mrs. Irene O'Crowley Craigmile Bolam, was a jet-setting international businesswoman who in 1958, married Guy Bolam of England, the person who originally founded the business she ran.
 
Beyond facing the press to challenge the McGraw-Hill Company, Amelia Earhart Lives author, Joe Klaas, and Joseph A. Gervais, whose ten year investigation had inspired Klaas to write about it, Mrs. Bolam followed-up with a defamation lawsuit against them.  
 

_

Below: The indomitable Mrs. Irene Bolam

AAAAAAnov70confA.jpg


Irene
O'Crowley
Craigmile
Bolam 
Versus
McGraw-Hill

mcgrawhill.jpeg

The Irene Bolam versus McGraw-Hill defamation case that lasted from 1971 to 1976, was more complex than people realized. Mrs. Bolam had claimed to be an ordinary New Jersey housewife, although in actuality, she was a world traveler who presided over 'Guy Bolam Associates' that sported major global clients, to include Radio Luxembourg. 

000001AGBasscB.jpg

0000001Aradiolux.jpg

 

Although Mrs. Bolam rejected the book's implication about her, the press conference she held and her subsequent lawsuit did not put an end to her 'real identity' controversy. True, in the years that followed, strangely enough even the New York State legal system (see below) was not able to determine if she was or wasn't the former Amelia Earhart. In fact, few people realized that the controversy over Mrs. Irene Bolam's life-long identity never came close to being settled in a forensic kind of way. 
 

 
1974

ZZZZZfouryearsA1.jpg

1982

0000001atrib4.jpg

0000001atrib2.jpg


2009 
"Lou Foudray calls the investigative research of Gervais and Swindell, ""Just the tip of the Iceberg."" "All the evidence all put together, I feel like she [Amelia] did survive. I think she survived and came back to the United States, but that she wanted her privacy." Lou Foudray, Amelia Earhart Historian and former proprietor of the Amelia Earhart Birthplace Museum in Atchison, Kansas, is quoted from interviews conducted by Lara Moritz of KMBC TV, Kansas City, and by The Topeka Kansas Capital-Journal's, Jan Biles. Mrs. Foudray believed that the combined research of Joseph A. Gervais and the in-progress forensic analysis orchestrated by Tod Swindell, had already provided enough proof to conclude that Amelia Earhart had survived after she went missing, and that in time she became known as, Irene O'Crowley Craigmile (and later, 'Bolam'.) She also correctly projected that there was much to the story that remained unknown, by way of her, "tip of the iceberg" anology. 
 

Some reporters kept tracking the curious, unresolved case of who Irene Bolam really was, or used to be. The reason the controversy over her identity was never fully settled was found in the forensic analysis that ended up displaying how more than one Twentieth Century woman had been attributed to the same, Irene O'Crowley Craigmile Bolam identity. It also revealed that the Irene who faced the press in 1970, appeared nowhere identified as 'Irene' prior to the 1940s. In short, she was not the original Irene, who is shown again here: 
 

AAAorigirene4.jpg

-- 

000001AIOCB.jpg

Above, the former Amelia Earhart, AKA, the post-1940 only Irene O'Crowley Craigmile-Bolam, faced the press in 1970 to defend her honor and dignity, and her right to keep on living the private life she had grown accustomed to. That's easy enough to understand and accept. The bottom line, however, is that she was not the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, and she was well aware of that.
 

0001aipress.jpg

--

--

0001agtvA.jpg

In the decades that followed 1970, Joseph A. Gervais (above) continued to be interviewed on television, all the while insisting, no matter what anyone else said or believed, that the 'Irene Bolam' who he met and photographed in 1965, most definitely was the former Amelia Earhart. He died in 2005, having never disavowed his certainty about it, and in the end, Tod Swindell's forensic research and comparison analysis proved him correct.

00-aaaaagerv2.jpg

Tod Swindell and Joseph A. Gervais in 2002. 
 
 

-


 
More About How The Original
Irene O'Crowley Craigmile became a pilot
with help from Amelia and Viola Gentry:

-

ACraigmarker.jpg

 

Note: After Charles James Craigmile died of a sudden illness in 1931, as noted his widow, the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, who through her attorney aunt had met Amelia Earhart before, was swept under the wings of Amelia and Amelia's well-known pilot friend, Viola Gentry, in pursuit of her new dream of learning to fly airplanes: 

 

00001AEfirstplane.jpg

Amelia Earhart in 1921. In 1928, when she was thirty years
old she suddenly became famous. Soon after that she met the
original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile through Irene's aunt, a
noted attorney by the name of Irene Rutherford O'Crowley. 
 

AAAgentry2.jpg

Above, Viola Gentry in 1927.
She came to know the original
Irene through Amelia Earhart.
Viola Gentry was famous for her
endurance flying and stunt flying. 

-

023OI.JPG

The original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile,
shown next to her plane in 1932. The
following Spring she earned her pilot's
license, but her future as a pilot was
interrupted right after she did that.
 

-

As an unexpected twist of fate had it, just after the original Irene earned her pilot's license in mid-1933, she became pregnant out of wedlock, an issue that naturally interrupted her new life as a pilot. She went on to deliver a baby boy in early 1934, yet by the late 1930s, her son, (whose father was estranged) was being raised by a 'nanny' mother figure whom he grew up believing to be his biological mother. The original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile's pilot license was not renewed beyond 1937, and to this day her ultimate fate remains unclear. All that is known in a forensic way is that by the late 1930s, when her son was 3 to 5 years old, the original Irene was no longer evident. Her leftover identity, however, helped Amelia Earhart to become the non-public person that she had missed being during her fame years.
 
Before Amelia left on her 1937 world flight, she was sure to announce it would be her last flight of any significance, and she turned the attention of news reporters toward her pilot friend, Jackie Cochran, proclaiming that Jackie stood to be America's new female aviation heroine going forward. Attesting to this less-known fact, while Amelia prepped for her world flight in the Spring of 1937, she and Jackie Cochran flew together to Dayton, Ohio, where a slew of reporters and photographers anxiously awaited a glimpse of Amelia's new Lockheed Electra. When interviewed there, Amelia announced she was "retiring from stunt flying" and she proclaimed there was, "a new first lady of the air" as quoted directly here by Dale Francis of the Dayton Journal Herald:
 

1AAAAnewfirst.jpg


Jackie Cochran went on to receive the Harmon Trophy as the top female aviator the following year, (1938) and she served gallantly as the head of World War Two's, Women's Air Service Pilots division. Not to omit, she would later become the first woman to break the sound barrier, and as a good friend of Chuck Yeager's, she once aspired to become the first female astronaut. Of Amelia, Jackie later wrote in her autobiography, "God, the world hounded that woman after she became famous," and before Amelia left on her world flight, Jackie wrote, "I was closer to Amelia than anybody."
 
Some considered it was no accident that Jackie Cochran became the first American woman to set foot in Japan after VJ Day. One of them was Amelia Earhart researcher and author, Rollin C. Reineck, who recorded an interview he conducted with Monsignor James Francis Kelley, in 1991, that included the following exchange:
 
REINECK: "We believe Jackie Cochran was sent to Japan to help bring Amelia home. Are you aware of that?"
 
KELLEY: "Yes, I was involved with that."
 
Jackie mentioned that she was ordered to head to war-torn Japan by military brass right after the second atom bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, to, "write a story for Liberty Magazine about the way Japanese women participated in the air war." That reason of course, would have had no practical sense of urgency at the time, but no one questioned it, and her real mission to bring home the survived Amelia Earhart would not be connected to her trip until the late 1960s.
 
In the early 1980s, to one Donald Dekoster, a trusted acquaintance of Monsignor Kelley's, Mr. Dekoster quoted the Monsignor having mentioned to him about Amelia, "After all she'd been through she didn't want to be the famous Amelia Earhart anymore." He also reaffirmed later that Monsignor Kelley had described to him how he had received Amelia after the war and counseled her, and that he helped with her identity change to 'Irene.'   
 

 
Note: It seems clear enough that it did become known by U.S. military intelligence at some point during the war years, that Amelia was still alive overseas, although it seems equally clear that Amelia had grown tired of the attention she constantly received before she left on her world flight, and that she was intent on seeking peace for herself after she completed it, and apparently, she never let go of that vision. To gain some insight toward the way Amelia regarded the world fame that she achieved during her flying career, consider the following quote from one of her biographers, Doris Rich: 
 
"Over the nine years spanning her first and last transoceanic flights, Amelia Earhart became one of the most famous women in the world. The private Amelia disliked that fame intensely." From author-historian, Doris Rich's 1989 biography of Amelia Earhart.
 

 
~~~
 
About The "post 1940 only Irene" Moniker
 
The analysis discovered that the post-1940 only Irene O'Crowley Craigmile (Bolam) was not identifiable anywhere as 'Irene' prior to the 1940s. When combined with its other realizations, hindsight revealed that the post-1940 only Irene's past identity question emerged in 1970 as a valid controversy -- that became obfuscated by endless deliberating -- thus enabling the former Amelia Earhart to continue on living the post-World War Two era 'private life' she'd grown accustomed to, and so obviously preferred not to abandon.

 
Two Friends...

0000001AmolliBAAAA.jpg

Above: Eleanor Roosevelt and Amelia Earhart in 1933.
The two became friends after they met. Below is a digital
composite of Amelia's above image and a 1965 taken photo
of the post-1940 only Irene O'Crowley Craigmile (Bolam).

0001AIblend.jpg

~~~ 
-

"It is nearly impossible even for families to recognize a loved one after thirty years of absence, so greatly has the self altered. And a little reflection upon the changing quality of consciousness is sure to give us some insight into the numberless selves our surface minds and egos have become since first appearing in the world." Philosopher Uell Stanley Andersen (1917-1986)

 
Below, the post-1940 only Irene O'Crowley Craigmile Bolam in 1965.
 her look here may not remind us of her former life, yet there is no
question anymore that she did used to be known as Amelia Earhart.

JOSEPH A. GERVAIS PHOTO
1AAgervaispic52.jpg
POST-1940 ONLY IRENE O'CROWLEY CRAIGMILE BOLAM

~~~ 
An Executive Branch Quandary
Even A War Couldn't End

.
FDR2.jpg
.

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt
 


Below find excerpts from a document generated by the White House nine months after Amelia Earhart was declared a missing person. The full transcript it came from concerned information President Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration withheld that pertained to what actually happened to the famous pilot:

amorgyX2.jpg

ZZZZZorders2.jpg

amorgyX3.jpg

To this day no explanation has been given to account for the above recorded words, but it is now certain that Amelia Earhart continued to live-on well past July 2, 1937, the date she went missing. Here, one can understand why the secrecy that concerned what really happened to Amelia in July of 1937, and what became of her afterward, managed to remain in tact.

 

Note: The spirit of forensically recognizing and accepting the truth about what became of Amelia Earhart, was not born from an idea suggesting FDR's administration used bad judgment during the pre-dawn era of World War Two, when it optioned not to publicly disclose what it learned about the outcome of Amelia's failed world flight attempt.


~~~
Issued in 1987 by the Republic of the Marshall Islands:
 
Below is a 50th Anniversary commemorative stamp depicting Japan's Imperial
Navy rescuing Earhart and Noonan, and recovering Amelia's plane. This occurred
at the same time the second Sino-Japanese War was commencing, that served as a
precursor to World War Two. Whatever went wrong with the duo's flight plan, it put
the White House in a tough spot since the U.S. was against Japan's invasion of China.
 
The United States general public was conditioned not to recognize the Marshalls' version
of Amelia Earhart's world flight ending from the time it was first evidenced to a variety of
United States soldiers who had been sent to serve in World War Two's Pacific theater.
 

0000000stampsB.jpg

Below, this Associated Press article lead-in appeared in 2002. Ever since the World War Two era, different, 'Amelia ended up in the Marshalls' accounts akin to this one kept surfacing. Sadly, in the United States, few seem to care much about this reality based version of Amelia Earhart's world flight ending:

 

 

AAAAAAcappyx7.jpg

 

Especially in recent decades, people have been cajoled (or misled) into looking for Amelia's plane above all else, even though the sad reality is, her plane will never be found by privately organized and funded expeditions.

~~~

"While I do believe that Amelia Earhart ended her world flight quest in the lower Marshall Islands, I do not believe that she was a spy when she was 'picked up' there by Japan, the Marshall's governing authority when her world flight took place. I do consider, though, where James Donahue's British Connection research from the 1980s comes into play, and statements made by Lockheed employees that referenced how an additional plane similar to Amelia's had been readied to also participate in her world flight plan, that there possibly was another man and woman flight team in some other plane, that while doing reconnaissance over the Marshalls adjacent to Amelia's "civilian" flight plan, had encountered trouble and went down there. Where the White House transcript cited that Amelia disregarded all orders, this may have been relative to Amelia unexpectedly rerouting her flight and heading to the Marshall's in an effort to help the downed fliers, one of whom may have been the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile. (The original Irene was a competent pilot who had known Amelia, and Amelia was not shy and spoke some Japanese.) Unfortunately, the move backfired when Amelia learned the other plane had been shot down and the pilots did not survive, and she also realized she was viewed by Japan's military as a diversion 'accomplice' to the other plane's illicit activities, thus prompting her detainment, and eventually leading to the official silence that would always be maintained toward the matter by the governments of the United States and Japan." Tod Swindell
 

"Numerous investigations foundered on official silence in Washington and Tokyo, leaving the true fate of Amelia Earhart and Fred Noonan an everlasting mystery." 1982, aviation historians, Marylin Bender and Selig Altschul on the 1937 disappearance and subsequent missing person cases of Amelia Earhart, and her navigator, Fred Noonan, quoted from their book, The Chosen Instrument.
 

 

 

-

01-aaaameliasad.jpg

Above is Amelia Earhart in 1928, the year she instantly became famous. Nine years later, in 1937, she purportedly disappeared without a trace, and according to history she was never seen again.
 
Many documented World War Two 'Pacific Theater' servicemen from the U.S. and Japan, along with South Sea Islands' government officials and residents, disagreed with history there. They commonly stated, based on the eyewitness accounts of people who saw Amelia alive overseas after she was declared missing, and on other corroborating testimonials, that Amelia Earhart lived-on well after the date of her so called, disappearance. 
 
From the 1960s' on, several investigations that were conducted also agreed with this conclusion. Throughout the war years, Amelia's mother, Amy Otis Earhart, also insisted that her daughter was still alive overseas based on information she'd privately been made aware of.
 

-

1AAelinorAAA.jpg

Again, above is Amelia Earhart (left) and Viola Gentry, two
good pilot friends in the 1930s, who both knew and helped
the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile to earn her wings.
By the late 1930s, however, the original Irene was gone, and
to this day it remains unclear what her ultimate fate was.
 Reusing a few photos, the box below has more on this trio:

023OI.JPG

The original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile,
again shown next to her plane in 1933.
 She was commonly referred to as,
'Irene Craigmile' as listed below:

000001craigfuneral1933.jpg
MAY 1933

00001AEfirstplane.jpg

Again, Amelia Earhart, before she became famous. Eight
years after she met the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, 
Amelia Earhart was declared a missing person. Then in 1939,
to release her estate to her next of kin, she was legally
declared, 'dead in absentia' after no certain explanation
to account for what became of her could be given.

-

AAAgentry2.jpg

Above, Viola Gentry,
"The Flying Cashier."
She and the original
Irene lived in the same
Brooklyn apartment
building for awhile.
Viola often invited
the original Irene to
events she attended,
like this one in 1933:

000001ViolagovCraig1933.jpg

-

000001violacraigdrum1933.jpg

Another 1933 press notice telling of Viola Gentry entertaining Lady Drummond
Hay of England, along with the original Irene Craigmile and other pilots.
Note: Pearl Pellaton lived in the same 316 Rutland Rd apartment
building in Brooklyn that the original Irene and Viola did.

1AAnewsA.jpg

The above 1932 Akron, Ohio newspaper photo featured Amelia Earhart (outlined in white), Viola Gentry (outlined in gray), next to the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, (outlined in black.) Reprinted from today's available newspaper archive, when enlarged, the original Irene's facial image is the only one in the group with no discernible features: 
 

000000ilarge.jpg

 
Viola Gentry, who maintained Amelia was still alive after she went missing in 1937, was among the individuals who continued to know Amelia -- after Amelia assumed the original Irene's leftover identity. The same goes for Amelia's sister, Muriel. However, they never publicly acknowledged who their later-life friend, 'Irene' used to be. Instead, both strongly contested the suggestion whenever they were asked about it.
 

-

mcgrawhill.jpeg

 

There may have been more to the McGraw-Hill publishing controversies that took place in 1971, and their relationship to Amelia Earhart's old 'missing person' case than was realized at the time, and once again, where so, Viola Gentry may have figured in.

That one of the most reputable publishing houses in the world would issue consecutive books that dialed in on the life of Howard Hughes, and then quickly withdraw them both, is somewhat odd in itself. The first book was Amelia Earhart Lives, that threaded a theorized level of involvement that Howard Hughes possibly had in covering for Amelia after she went missing. (Read about the 'Irene Bolam versus McGraw-Hill's Amelia Earhart Lives book lawsuit' further down.) Hughes, a great pilot himself, was a known 1930s acquaintance of Amelia's, but he was never consulted by Joe Klaas, the author of Amelia Earhart Lives, and the book was withdrawn by McGraw-Hill in early 1971, shortly after it was published. Next, throughout 1971, Clifford Irving wrote a supposedly authorized by Howard Hughes 'autobiography' that was set to be published by McGraw-Hill at the end of the year. Once again, however, Clifford Irving did not consult with Hughes, and he was charged with perpetrating a hoax after Hughes objected to his book and claimed he'd never met Irving. This led to pressed copies of the book being burned by McGraw-Hill before they made it into circulation, and to some jail time for Irving as well. Interestingly enough, Joe Klaas was never challenged by Howard Hughes at all, nor was he fined or convicted of any crime, and neither was Joseph A. Gervais, whose ten year investigation Amelia Earhart Lives was largely about.

 

  

1AAmedal3.jpg

Amelia Earhart Medal

 
 

1AAmedal2.jpg

Presented to Howard Hughes
by Viola Gentry on Amelia's
sixty-sixth birthday, 7/24/1963

The Amelia Earhart medal displayed above, was presented to Howard Hughes by Viola Gentry two years before the former Amelia Earhart was first publicly recognized for who she used to be. Perhaps not so ironically, it was Viola Gentry who introduced the post-1940 only Irene to the gentleman who recognized her as the former Amelia Earhart, (Joseph A. Gervais) the day before this photograph was taken:

zzzzbolam3A.jpg

Above is Viola Gentry and Guy Bolam, on August 9, 1965, outside of the Sea Spray Inn of East Hampton, Long Island. The original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile was long gone by then. Viola had known her, just as she knew the new post-1940 only Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, who had married Guy Bolam in 1958, and who had previously been known as her famous flying friend, Amelia Earhart(Above photo taken by the former Amelia Earhart, AKA, Mrs. Guy Bolam.)
 
Below is an excerpt from Jennifer Bean Bower's 2015 biography of Viola Gentry, The Flying Cashier, where a 1941 interview Viola gave to Maybelle Manning was recalled. While reading these words, know that Viola maintained that her missing friend, Amelia, was still alive throughout the war years, yet after the war ended she stopped talking about her:

1AAaprilgen2.jpg

Knowing how close Viola Gentry had been to both Amelia Earhart and the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, it is incomprehensible to even entertain the idea that after 1940, Viola's friend, the original Irene, could have suddenly morphed into an older-version, carbon copy twin of Viola's famous friend, Amelia Earhart, who had gone missing years before, never to be seen again. It turned out the original Irene was gone by the end of the 1930s, and basically, Amelia, who had continued to live-on, took her name in the 1940s to further use for herself. 

 
Once Again...

 

 

AAAAustin1.jpg

1
Above, Amelia Earhart, age 39...  
 
 
 

 

 

AAAAustin2.jpg

2
...digitally transitions into...  
 

 

 

AAA36compCA.jpg

3
...Mrs. Guy Bolam in 1965
 

1AAAerelax2.jpg

Amelia Earhart, age 36...

00000000aaa10A1.jpg

 ...digitally transitions into... 

 

1AAIjamesberg3.jpg

...Mrs. Guy Bolam in 1977
 

ZZAACJICRJOC4A1A82.jpg

Above Center:
The original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, in
1930, shown between her husband and father.
After meeting Amelia Earhart through her
aunt, she briefly became a pilot herself until
 a pregnancy interrupted her flying days. 
Not by accident, no clear photos of the
original Irene are readily available today.
- 

     

-

"It's sad, in a way, how the profound greatness of Amelia Earhart's person became lost in the so-called mystery of her disappearance. Here, for a brief moment let's again look back at the outcome of Amelia's loss through words generated by the White House nine months after she was declared missing

amorgyX2.jpg

As mentioned, the White House never did reveal what it knew about Amelia Earhart's world flight outcome, and by now it is certain that the general public was dissuaded from being able to realize what really happened to Amelia.
 
Today, people seem to have forgotten that Amelia's 1937 disappearance was an international controversy, because it ended up being systemically swept under the rug of official history by the U.S. federal government. This exercise was already in the works in September of 1939, when Germany invaded Poland.
 
The facts of Amelia Earhart's loss continued to be obfuscated throughout the war years as well, and then even more exponentially after the war was over. Indeed, the effort to muddle the truth about what became of Amelia Earhart, actually continued on into the 1950s, until finally, it was determined that people in general had been conditioned enough to accept that Amelia simply crashed and sank at unknown ocean coordinates prior to completing her world flight, even though that was a far cry from what had actually happened.
 
Heeding to the false dictates of Amelia's living family members, institutions overseen by the U.S. federal government, and its offshoot cottage industries that managed to keep the the curious stupefied, this is all the public continues to know at this present space in time. And that's a shame. Basically, for decades gone by the citizenry of the United States has been spoon fed non-truths about Amelia Earhart's world flight outcome, by individuals that felt they were doing it for the better good of the body public. Anymore, though, it is obvious that Amelia managed to live-on and become known as one of three Twentieth Century women attributed to the same Irene O'Crowley Craigmile identity." Tod Swindell   
 

019bc.jpg

Above is Amelia Earhart and the post-1940 only Irene in a digital composite. Over the years people were conditioned to not pay attention to the never fully settled, Irene Bolam Versus McGraw-Hill lawsuit. Now, in 2021, the forensic analysis arranged by Tod Swindell, that concluded Amelia Earhart and the post-1940 only Irene were the same human being, has proved itself to be an incontestable equation. To better ascertain this for yourself, keep going to learn more about this new, fortified reality. 
  

 

"In the late 1990s, I couldn't believe it when I came to know Joseph A. Gervais, the Air Force officer whose ten year investigation had inspired the 1970 McGraw-Hill book, and he mentioned that no one had seriously compared Irene Bolam to Amelia Earhart before. It seemed odd, because after decades he was still insisting that she was the former Amelia Earhart." Tod Swindell 

 

00-aaaaagerv2.jpg

Tod Swindell and Joseph A. Gervais in 2002. 
 
 

"Many theories have been given by many different people; some bordering on the absurd, some plausible. Gervais’ theory as to what happened to Amelia Earhart is one of the plausible ones. Gervais and his colleagues were seasoned Air Force pilots, and thus, understood the problems in flying long distances over water as well as the technical aspects of flying aircraft. Their experience and some of the documents and leads uncovered in their research led them to believe that Amelia Earhart did indeed survive." Paul A. Oelkrug, C. A., University of Texas at Dallas, 2006.

 
Below, another digital composite example from the analysis:

000000001AEprof.jpg

Amelia Earhart
 
 

 -

000000000IAoverlayA77AA.jpg

Digital Composite
 
 

00000001IBpressa2AA.jpg

The post-1940 Irene Bolam 

JOSEPH A. GERVAIS PHOTO
1AAgervaispic52.jpg
IRENE O'CROWLEY CRAIGMILE BOLAM

Above is how the post-1940 only Irene Bolam looked in 1965. Hardly a soul felt that she resembled Amelia Earhart all that much, and while looking at this photograph that Joseph A. Gervais took of her that year, it seems understandable. Most people assumed Gervais' assertion that suggested she was the former Amelia Earhart, was debunked at some point, but it never was, and to people's astonishment, the Twenty First Century forensic analysis displayed her to have been congruent to Amelia Earhart. This included by way of Digital Face Recognition, that was much improved and became more available in the Twenty First Century: 

0001AE2compBCD.jpg

Amelia Earhart...
(continued below)

-

1AAgervaismorphA.jpg

A Digital Face Recognition grid
common to the post-1940 Irene
O'Crowley Craigmile Bolam
and Amelia Earhart. Same
posturing of head position
and neck to the shoulders
is clearly evident as well.
 

1AAgervAmor2.jpg

Light shading adjustments can
help to exact a common face print
within a digital composite.

AAAAustin1.jpg

...begins to...
 

AAAAustin2.jpg

...digitally transition into...
 

AAA36compCA.jpg

...the post-1940 Irene
 

Tod Swindell's human comparison study revealed that more than one person had been attributed to the same Irene Bolam identity, and the one above shown compared to Amelia, was not identifiable as "Irene" prior to the 1940s. The study also determined that not only facially, but the post-1940 Irene's entire physical being was congruent to Amelia Earhart's physical being, as were her character traits. These 'forensic realities' were not known before the study took place. Why? Once again, simply put, no one had ever seriously compared Irene Bolam to Amelia Earhart before.
  

-

ZZdrbirkby2.jpg

Dr. Walter S. Birkby 

Dr. Walter S. Birkby, a noted Forensic Anthropologist who advised on key portions of Tod Swindell's analysis, challenged himself with a, 'if this, then that' argument when it came to the assertion of Amelia living-on and becoming known as Irene.

Based on the different Irene Bolam's that Dr. Birkby acknowledged the study displayed, with the Irene that proved herself to be congruent to Amelia Earhart appearing nowhere as 'Irene' prior to the 1940s, it was prudent of Dr. Birkby to offer his expert opinion in said manner.

In Rollin Reineck's book, Amelia Earhart Survived, Dr. Birkby commented on the difficulty he had in nullifying the post-1940 Irene as the former Amelia Earhart. (Dr. Birkby was originally engaged by Tod Swindell to nullify her if he could. He couldn't.)   

Dr. Birkby acknowledged that the cranium, hairline, facial features, and neck-to-torso of the post-1940 Irene were the same as Amelia's. He was also impressed with the post-1940 Irene's eyes, calling them, "a perfect match spacing wise and tear-duct to tear-duct" to Amelia's eyes.

Beyond aging and some obvious post-1940 changes that included hairstyles, fashion, and makeup, there may have been some nasal work endured by the post-1940 Irene as well, but nothing (according to Dr. Birkby) that would have been unexplainable in medical terms. Dr. Birkby also pointed out that while it varies, a person's ears and nose will continue to grow as he or she gets older. Thus his, "if this, then that" approach surely would apply where the idea was for the 'Irene Bolam' in question not to be recognized for who she used to be.

So the "if this, then that" example would be: If at some point, Amelia Earhart optioned for a non-public life going forward after she was declared "missing" in 1937, and "dead in absentia" in 1939, then her overall objective that involved changing her name and altering her appearance some, would have included her not wanting to be recognized for who she used to be.

 

 

It stands to reason: The plural Irene's realization coupled with the digital composites that revealed the post-1940 only Irene's full head-to-toe congruence to Amelia Earhart, when further combined with the overwhelming preponderance of circumstantial evidence, and the eyewitnesses that pointed to Amelia's continued existence after the date of her so-called disappearance, never amounted to, just a coincidence.

 

1AAImerit44.jpg

AA1imerit82.jpg

AA1Imerit222.jpg
AA1Imerit332.jpg

Above, the post-1940 Irene in 1965, digitally transitions into Amelia in 1935. Face to face, head to head, neck to neck, shoulders to shoulders, heights, appendages, etc., all aligned with exactitude.

 

 

A key indicator of the post-1940 only Irene was the large flower pendant that she often wore. (See it outlined in the boxes below.) Joseph A. Gervais believed it to be emblematic of her former identity of 'AE' for people in the know.

 

1AAImerit5.jpg

Merritt Island, Florida - 1965
 

1AAdubrov3.jpg

Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia - 1976
 

022.JPG

Senator Hiram Bingham
& Amelia Earhart
 
 

1AAIBjames2.jpg

1977

00000001IB2AA.jpg

Digital Composite

 
 

 
Amelia Earhart
Rescued and Detained as opposed to
Captured, Imprisoned, and Executed
 
"In the Twenty First Century, clarity was delivered to the suppressed fact that Amelia Earhart did not go missing somewhere in the equatorial South Sea Islands. From the World War Two era on, in a contiguous manner, the people who saw her alive there and knew who she was shared the non-promoted reality of it with others. They commonly stressed that Amelia went down on a remote, civilized land-mass in the lower Marshall Islands, where she and her navigator, Fred Noonan, were rescued within a matter of days by Japan's Naval Authority, just as Japan was beginning to engage China in the second Sino-Japanese War.
 
This first-ever 'human comparison analysis' managed to surface non-contestable body evidence that displayed Amelia Earhart alive as 'Irene Bolam' long after she went missing. Therefore, coupled with the reality that Amelia had continued to privately live-on that way, it appears certain anymore that all along, the event of her rescue in the lower Marshall's and her subsequent detainment was nothing less than straight-forward information delivered by honest speaking people." Tod Swindell 
 

 
Amelia Earhart In The
Marshall Islands

aaaawilson2.jpg

Above, a remarkable 1994 book authored by Donald Moyer Wilson, (revised in 1999) displayed well over a hundred testimonials offered by South Sea Islands residents, World War Two soldiers from the U.S. and Japan, U.S. military brass, and more, that described Amelia Earhart's post loss survival under Japan's stewardship. The common thread that existed among the testimonials was that Amelia went down in the lower Marshall Islands where she and her navigator were rescued and detained by Japan's Imperial Naval Authority. Although a few people said they heard that Amelia may have died while in Japan's custody, no real evidence was ever found to support that such a thing had happened.

Below once again, this Associated Press article lead-in appeared in 2002. Ever since the World War Two era, different accounts akin to this one kept surfacing. In the United States, to this very day few seem to care about this reality based version of Amelia Earhart's world flight ending:

AAAAAAcappyx7.jpg

 
Below, a 'Winter of 2015' article by Larry Clark, featured in an issue of Washington State University magazine, described some recent Marshall Islands travel-adventures of school teacher and WSU alumni, Dick Spink. Well studied on Amelia Earhart, Mr. Spink first visited the Marshalls in 2006, and was amazed that the history of Amelia Earhart having been there was common knowledge: 
 

AAAspink.jpg

Below, again the 1987 "50th anniversary" commemorative stamp issued by the Marshall Islands, depicts the rescue of Amelia Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan, and the recovery of Amelia's plane.

0000000stampsB.jpg

 
"While Amelia's rescue and detainment in the Marshall's is generally accepted to have been true by astute researchers of Amelia Earhart's missing person case, the account went awry in the 1960s, when people started pushing sensationalized conjecture that touted Amelia as a 'spy' who was captured, imprisoned, and executed. The fact is, however, nobody ever knew that to be true. In the meantime, the later introduced notion that said Amelia continued to live-on after she was rescued and detained -- that she continued to survive -- and that at some point she changed her name, seemed to go over the vast majority of people's heads. Yet it is obvious anymore, that did happen." Tod Swindell
 

 
Disclaimer: Nat Geo Versus Wikipedia 
 
Before Tod Swindell embarked on his studyprevious investigations of Amelia Earhart's disappearance and missing person case had not bothered to compare Irene Bolam to Amelia Earhart.

Wikipedia's "Irene Craigmile Bolam" page posted in 2007, is misleading. Where it states, "Bolam's personal life history has since been thoroughly documented, eliminating any possibility she was Earhart", it is now known that statement is untrue. It turned out here was an original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile who Amelia had known in the 1930s, and that was not the person who faced the press in 1970, who later demonstrated an overall congruence to Amelia Earhart. Although clear photo evidence of the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile is all but non-extant today, below is how her image appeared in a newspaper photo taken in 1930. Once again, she was not the same Irene who faced the press in 1970:
 

ZZAACJICRJOC4A1A.jpg

1930 dated newspaper photo of Charles James Craigmile, his wife,
the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, and the original Irene's
father, Richard Joseph O'Crowley.
 
Below, the original Irene's image is enhanced.

AAAorigirene4.jpg

 
The wikipedia page also incorrectly mentions that a National Geographic hired forensic detective "concluded" that Amelia did not become known as Irene Bolam. This was and remains a fabrication issued by the person who launched the page, Dr. Alex Mandel, of Ukraine. Dr. Mandel posted the page in 2007, after learning about the comparison study Tod Swindell had embarked on. Dr. Mandel, favored a claim stating Japan had captured and imprisoned Amelia in 1937, and that she died in its custody. Japan, of course, maintains to this day that it never harmed Amelia Earhart.

In recent decades there has been an aligned contingency of individuals that have influenced news media outlets (and therefore the general public) in different directions about Amelia Earhart's 1937 world flight outcome. This has prevented the reality of Amelia's post-1940 'private life' existence from being openly embraced. While the Smithsonian and National Geographic Society have always ridden the fence about Amelia's final fate, their one exception has been to traditionally downplay the 'Amelia became Irene' conveyance.
 
The "forensic detective" who briefly appeared on a Nat Geo special in 2006, Kevin Richlin, had little foreknowledge of the Amelia-to-Irene postulation, and merely looked at a few photo samples given to him by Nat Geo's producers. After doing so, he suggested if the material they gave him was 'all there was' to support the assertion of Amelia becoming known as Irene, then he would advise the proponents of it to 'move on to something else.' Detective Richlin never deeply evaluated the postulation himself, nor did he come close to "concluding" that Amelia having changed her name to Irene was forensically untrue. Given all that was learned about it dating back to the late 1960s, it would have taken a much more serious evaluation on his part to make a forensic determination. Thus the adage, "Don't believe everything you read in wikipedia." 
 

Beauty is truth, truth beauty,
 
that is all ye know on earth,
 
and all ye need to know.
 
Keats
 

Although history tried to impress upon people that the two Irene Bolam images below represented one in the same person, the analysis revealed them to have been entirely different human beings:

0000001acvr.jpg

The above cover features a 1970s photo.
According to record, Irene O'Crowley
Craigmile Bolam died on July 7, 1982,
and a Memorial Dinner was held for
her in October. Anymore the question
is, which Irene died that year? The one
above did not match Amelia Earhart at
all. She was not the original Irene either.
Rather, she served as a mother figure
to the original Irene's 1934 born son. 

1Agervaispic2.jpg

Above book page leaf:
Reprinted with permission from Joe Klaas,
the author of the 1970 McGraw-Hill book,
Amelia Earhart LivesThe Irene in the
photo only appeared as 'Irene' after 1940.

 
Shown above, as mentioned, a key discovery that Tod Swindell made during the course of his study:  There was more than one Twentieth Century person attributed to the same Irene Bolam identity. In fact there were three, for the person featured on Irene Bolam's memorial dinner program cover was not the original Irene, nor was she the post-1940 only Irene. This is edified further down. In the meantime...

 

The Positive ID Placement Made By Irene Craigmile Bolam's Son:

 

From Tod Swindell: Thursday, February 20, 2014
Subject: Verification

 

Hi Larry,

I want you to know that I am in full agreement with you that Amelia Earhart was not your mother. Your mother, as you identified her in these younger and older version photos, led a very different life than Amelia and bore little resemblance to her physically. Our agreement on this matter is pertinent to the correct presentation of the facts.  

My conveyance is that you have positively identified these images as those of your late mother, and that she absolutely was not, and never possibly could have been Amelia Earhart. I agree with this 100%, and understand that you do too. If you could you send back a simple ‘I agree’ for verification I’d appreciate it.

Thanks,

Tod

 

Clarence Alvin 'Larry' Heller: Friday, February 21, 2014
Subject: Re: Identity Verification

The attached pictures are of my mother and she was not Amelia Earhart. C. Heller   Proof is available.

origjunior.jpg
"AROUND 1940"

038.JPG
"1970s"

 
Reviewing A White House Preface:
 

ZZZZwhiteHouse2.jpg

amorgyX2.jpg

ZZZZZorders2.jpg

amorgyX3.jpg

The above sentences were photo-copied from a White House transcript that referred to the actual outcome of Amelia Earhart's 1937 world flight attempt. They were recorded in 1938, nine months after Amelia was reported 'missing'. 
 
The Executive Branch of the United States Federal Government has never revealed the details it knew about Amelia's 1937 world flight outcome, dating back to the administration of President Franklin Roosevelt.
~~~
 

Newspaper Headlines 
from July 2 & 3, 1937:

AAAAAlost3.jpg

AEmissing4.jpg

000001Aemissing1937-wichita-beacon.jpg

~~~

00000000ae2bA3.jpg

Amelia in 1936

00000000aaa10A1.jpg

Amelia and her later-life
  self in a digital composite.  

 
"The forensic determinations that showed Amelia Earhart's physical being alive as 'Irene' in the last half of the Twentith Century are non-contestable." Tod Swindell
 

 Reviewing the Foundation of this Forensic Research Study

The below investigative accounts of Amelia Earhart's 1937 disappearance were extensively analyzed in a recently completed study. The endeavor was undertaken to shed a better light on Amelia Earhart's old missing person case, that was historically left unresolved. The end result is a new Manuscript and Forensic Analysis entitled, Protecting Earhart. Both are set to be issued in 2021 by independent researcher and film producer, Tod Swindell. His documentary film that has been years in the making is also nearing completion. This website serves as a preview.

 

00000daughter.jpg

1960

aaagoerner.jpg

1966

AAAAklaasA.jpg

1970

LLLLoomis.jpg

1985

AAmyers3.jpg

1985

aaaadonahue.jpg

1987

000001AbrinkLS.jpg

1993 UK, 1994 US

aaaawilson2.jpg

1994, revised-1999

017.JPG

2004

Jameson.jpg

2016
 
 

All of the above investigations determined that during the pre-dawn era of World War Two, Amelia Earhart, and her navigator, Fred Noonan, did not lose their lives by crashing into the Pacific Ocean at unknown coordinates, as the public was left to assume. As well, five of them ended up concluding that Amelia Earhart not only survived beyond the date of her disappearance, [July 2, 1937] but that she continued to live-on, and in time changed her name. Most people found that hard to believe. Now, (as Paul Harvey used to say) here's the rest of the story... 

 

 

 An Old Story with a New Twist

The following material is exclusive to Tod Swindell's Twenty First Century analysis, that revealed a non-publicized forensic reality about Amelia Earhart. 

 

As the world knows, Amelia Earhart was declared 'missing' in 1937, and then 'dead in absentia' in 1939. Thus far, historians at the Smithsonian have been encouraging people to not pay attention to the digital composites issued by the analysis, even though they are non-contestable.
 
Again:

1aIprofileA1A.jpg

The post-1940
Irene in 1977
 

1AcompD.jpg

Amelia Earhart and the post-1940 Mrs. Irene
O'Crowley Craigmile Bolam, AKA Mrs. Guy Bolam
in a Digital Composite from the overall analysis.
(She had wed Guy Bolam of England in 1958.)
 
 

ZZZZZZIOC2ABC1ABC.jpg

The post-1940 Irene O'Crowley
Craigmile Bolam in 1977
 

 
The comparisons not only demonstrated an overall Amelia-to-Irene congruence, they also evidenced that the 'Irene' above was not identifiable as 'Irene' prior to 1940.
 
It is essential to recognize that there actually was a 1930s pilot by the name of, Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, who, although her prominent family never officially reported it, went missing close to the same time Amelia Earhart did. This person was simply known as 'Irene Craigmile' and both Amelia and her well-known pilot friend, Viola Gentry, knew her and had flown with her. According to Viola, Amelia had introduced her to Irene Craigmile. Learn more about the original Irene further down. For now, below are excerpts from a letter written in 1967 by one Elmo Pickerill, who at the time was serving as secretary of a Long Island based club called, The Early Birds of Aviation: 
 
 

AAA63apickerill82.jpg

AAA36xpickerill5.jpg

1abeevi2.jpg

Above, a small brownie camera photo
from 1932, listed Amelia climbing on the
wing, Jack Warren in the rear pilot seat, and
Irene Craigmile & Viola Gentry standing. The
plane had recently been purchased by Irene.
 
Below once again, is a photo that appeared in the Akron Ohio Beacon Journal on September 1, 1932. Outlined in white is Amelia Earhart; outlined in gray is Viola Gentry; outlined in black and fully shaded is the original Irene Craigmile: 

1AAnewsA.jpg

Where one takes the time to enlarge each facial image in the above photo, it's somewhat curious that Irene's is the only one where no facial features are discernable. The photo was reprinted from today's available newspaper archives.
 

ZZAACJICRJOC4A1A.jpg

Again, the 1930 dated newspaper photo of
Charles James Craigmile, his wife, Irene, and
Irene's father, Richard Joseph O'Crowley.
 
Below, Irene's image is enhanced.

AAAorigirene4.jpg

In late 1931, Charles James Craigmile
fell ill and died within three days time.
From his September obituary:  

00001ACJcraigABC.jpg

00001ACJcraigAAAA.jpg

A year after Charles died, his widow, Irene,
began taking flying instructions from Viola
Gentry's husband, Jack Warren.
 

   

AAA36cover.jpg


 
"The courts have yet to decide
the matter once and for all."
 
After the news story about her broke in 1970, Mrs. Guy Bolam, sued for defamation. Her attorney referenced where the Air Force officers' new book, Amelia Earhart Lives, contained factual errata beyond insinuating that his client, Mrs. Bolam, was possibly a bigamist and a traitor. Four years later, in 1974, as the follow-up news article stated, the 'courts' still had not decided if Mrs. Guy Bolam was or wasn't the former Amelia Earhart, and in the end it was left that way. When her defamation case was finally settled in 1976, Mrs. Guy Bolam, who had originally sought $1.5 million in damages, was awarded $60,000 to be paid by the book's publisher, McGraw-Hill. The Air Force officers were left alone, however, since the question of Mrs. Bolam's former identity remained unanswered. Amazingly, it stayed that way well into the Twenty First Century, until Tod Swindell's comprehensive forensic analysis was undertaken, the first one ever to compare Mrs. Guy Bolam to Amelia Earhart, that naturally delivered its telling results.
 


 
A handwriting example from the character
traits section of the comparison analysis:

000000001Aibsig1.jpg

Above is a cryptic handwritten line from a 1967 note penned by the post-1940 Irene to Joseph A. Gervais. She actually wrote about two people who, 'knew us both well as Amelia Earhart and Irene Craigmile'. 
 
Below is Amelia's own 'Amelia M Earhart' signature the way it appeared on a school form she filled out when she was seventeen. The similarity of the cursive styles is no coincidence since the same hand produced them.   
 

000000001AEsig1.jpg

Below, more from the Character Traits section of the comparison study, some of the post-1940 Irene (O'Crowley Craigmile) Bolam's cursive letters are shown on the left, and some cursive letter samples from when she lived as Amelia are shown on the right:

000000001AsideswritA4A.jpg

000000001AsideswritA5A.jpg

000000001AsideswritA6A.jpg

000000001AsideswritA1A.jpg

000000001AsideswritA2A.jpg

000000001AsideswritA3A.jpg

 
Looking Back at the Life
of Mrs. Guy Bolam
 

Note: It was Joseph A. Gervais (USAF Ret.), who in 1965, encountered Mrs. Guy Bolam at a gathering of senior pilots in New York. After he was introduced to her, without formally receiving permission, he took a photograph showing her next to her British husband, Guy Bolam, who she had wed in 1958: 
 

AAAguyirene2.jpg

00000001bolam1A2A.jpg

aaaaklassbook23.jpg

Above left, the 1965 photo taken by Joseph A. Gervais of Mr. and Mrs. Guy Bolam; center, from the original negative; right, the infamous 1970 book, Amelia Earhart Lives, that the 'Guy and Irene Bolam' photo appeared in. It is easy to see why Mrs. Bolam did not remind people of Amelia Earhart, until recent years, when the digital composites the forensic analysis generated were issued.
 

-

000000000AES3A217BCA.jpg

Above: February 5, 2000, retired USAF Major Joseph A. Gervais, accepts the Amelia Earhart Society of Researchers 'Historical Achievement Award' for his unparalleled investigative research and final analysis of Amelia Earhart's failed world flight attemptThe Society's founding President, Bill Prymak, referred to Joe Gervais as, "A World War Two flying hero widely recognized as the world's leading authority regarding the subject of Amelia Earhart's disappearance." Joseph A. Gervais died in 2005, having never disavowed that at some point after she went missing in 1937, Amelia Earhart took the name of a past 1930s' acquaintance of hers, Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, whose demise was obscured to enable it.
 
One might ask: Why is it that people in general have never heard of Joseph A. Gervais?
 
The best answer was given by Gervais himself: "No one was was ever supposed to know that Amelia survived and took on another identity, so my 1960s investigation that learned she did was swept under the rug of official history." 
 

 
Once Again...

 

 

AAAAustin1.jpg

1
Above, Amelia Earhart, age 39...  
 
 
 

 

 

AAAAustin2.jpg

2
...digitally transitions into...  
 

 

 

AAA36compCA.jpg

3
...Mrs. Guy Bolam in 1965
 

00000000ae2bA3.jpg

Amelia Earhart, age 36...

00000000aaa10A1.jpg

 ...digitally transitions into... 

 

ZZZZZZIOCCB7.jpg

...Mrs. Guy Bolam in 1977
 

"Before his passing took place in 2005, I befriended and came to know Joseph A. Gervais, and I was surprised when he mentioned that no one had ever really compared Irene Bolam to Amelia Earhart before. Based on the national news-making claim that he made about her in 1970, I found that hard to believe and decided to do something about it."  Tod Swindell
 

 
Below, the most significant realization from Tod Swindell's overall analysis, that is tantamount to understanding the duplicity that characterized the Amelia-to-Irene equation and how it was originally contrived, was the discovery of not just two, but three different Twentieth Century women having been attributed to the same Irene O'Crowley Craigmile identity. This was never ascertained before. Not to omit, the one who matched Amelia Earhart appeared nowhere as 'Irene' prior to 1940:

1

ZZAACJICRJOC4A1A.jpg

AAAorigirene4.jpg

2

origjunior.jpg

AAAAgoodolderIJRAA.jpg

3

ZZZZZZZ46AE.jpg

IB65ABC5.jpg

 
Above on the left is the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile in 1930, who Amelia Earhart had known, shown between her first husband, Charles James Craigmile, and her father, Richard Joseph O'Crowley. She did not resemble Amelia Earhart. The original Irene went missing around the same time Amelia did. What became of her is unknown .
 
Above in the center, shown in younger and older forms, is the surrogate mother of the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile's 1934 born son. She was also attributed to the same identity of Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, after she took over raising the original Irene's son in 1937.
 
To the right is the third Irene O'Crowley Craigmile-Bolam, shown on top in 1946, and below in 1965. She married Englishman, Guy Bolam, in 1958. The forensic study concluded that she was not identifiable as Irene O'Crowley Craigmile prior to 1940. [The math should start to get simple here.]
 

1AAGIAEprof.jpg

Amelia
 
 

 
Digitally Forensic

  

00000000ae2bA3.jpg

Amelia

00000000000aaa10A1B.jpg

Post-1940 Irene & Amelia
digitally combined

.
aaaaadidgitalface3.jpg
.


Accredited Digital Face Recognition programs
arrived in the Twenty First Century

Tod Swindell's comprehensive forensic research study that deeply reviewed the known facts of Amelia Earhart's disappearance, also examined the full-life story of Irene O'Crowley Craigmile Bolam. This included comparing her physical being and character traits to Amelia's. According to a purely objective viewpoint, the results of his study only appear to affirm the concealed reality of Amelia Earhart's post-1940 life as, Irene.

 

~~~

 The Amelia To Irene Forensic Study

© Tod Swindell 1997-2020

What The Entirety Of The Accumulated Data Revealed

data (noun): a general collection of facts, such as numbers, words, measurements, observations and descriptions of things

forensic (adjective): belonging to, used in, or suitable to courts of law or to public discussion and debate

~~~

First, a look at how the Amelia Earhart to Irene Bolam assertion became clouded by misinformation:  

 

Note: Of the invented Amelia Earhart cottage industries shown below, the oldest and most notable being Tighar, and the most recent being Chasing Earhart, (that surfaced in 2017) none of them produced significant factual data pertaining to the 1937 disappearance and missing person case of Amelia Earhart. Nor did they produce authentic evidence to help explain what actually happened to her. Basically, cottage industries such as these operate as businesses that exploit the mystery of Amelia Earhart's disappearance in the interest of adulatory pursuits and financial benefit.    

 

01-tighar.jpg

 
TIGHAR

-1-tnauticos.jpg

NAUTICOS

01-tchasing.jpg

 

CHASING EARHART

 

Contrarily, the 1960s investigations of two individuals, Fred Goerner and Joseph A. Gervais, along with the 1980s investigation of Randall Brink, that reviewed and solidified the data originally generated by Goerner and Gervais, and then expanded on it, well eclipses any information produced by other parties on the subjects of Amelia Earhart's 1937 disappearance and her post-loss missing person case. 

Based on the additional accumulated data that supports the authentic findings of Goerner, Gervais, and Brink, it is pragmatic to ignore viewpoints expressed by Amelia Earhart cottage industries that offer other ideas. Especially where so much of the data the earlier investigations generated has now been solidified by the Twenty First Century efforts of investigative researcher, Tod Swindell. His first-ever, 'Amelia-to-Irene' comparative analysis was part of a massive, in-depth study that commenced some twenty odd years ago. The results he achieved only affirmed that Joseph A. Gervais, was correct all along where he determined that Amelia Earhart lived well beyond 1937, excepting that she had changed her name for both political reasons, and for the sake of her own future privacy. 

"Special recognition goes to Tod Swindell, who undertook an extensive, in-depth forensic analysis of the post-1940 Irene (O'Crowley Craigmile) Bolam as compared to Amelia Earhart, to show the world they were one in the same person." In his book, Amelia Earhart Survived, a quote from author and golden age of aviation historian, USAF Colonel Rollin C. Reineck. [Colonel Reineck was a Joseph A. Gervais collaborator from 1990 to 2005.]

 

Tod2A.jpg

Tod Swindell

 

Some years ago, after meeting and getting to know Joseph A. Gervais (USAF Ret.) from 1996 to 2005, it perplexed me to learn that no one had ever disproved his 1970 assertion that stated Amelia Earhart had changed her name and continued to live-on for decades after she was declared 'missing' in 1937. This is because the former Amelia Earhart hired powerful lawyers that did an incredible job when it came to obfuscating the life story of Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, a real person Amelia had known in the 1930s, whose leftover identity the famous pilot went on to assume for herself after 1940.

Today, we need only remind ourselves that from 1970 to 2016, five nationally published book authors averred that Amelia Earhart survived her disappearance and later became known as Irene. Could the reason be they were advancing the truth, except the general public, that was basically unfamiliar with the shouted-down 'Amelia to Irene' story, found it too hard to believe? Yep. That's basically it. I've worked hard on developing and exposing the reality of this truth ever since meeting Joseph A. Gervais, a great pilot himself and a veteran of three foreign wars, who died in 2005, never having disavowed what he alone discovered. As the year 2021 kicks off a new decade with positive vaccine news, perhaps it is time for our body public to begin taking the now obvious reality of Amelia's later life existence more seriously. Especially when compared to the variety off-base, Johnny come lately Earhart theories presented in recent decades by glitzy looking cottage industries out there, the ineffective activities of which dominate the news media and the internet, in turn hindering the verisimilitude of Amelia's post-1940 life as Irene O'Crowley Craigmile from cleanly shining through. Tod Swindell, 2020  

 


Below the following dedications, continue to examine Tod Swindell's landmark forensic undertaking.
 

 

Dedicated to

Doris Kearns Goodwin and Amy Kleppner

DKGoodwin.jpg

Akleppner.jpg

   

Above, Historian Doris Kearns Goodwin (left) and Amy Kleppner
(right) Educator, Doctor of Philosophy, Amelia Earhart's niece. 
 

RuthbaderG.jpg

Justice
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
1933-2020
 

Also honoring the life of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who, "...bore witness to, argued for, and helped to constitutionalize the most hard fought and least-appreciated revolution in modern American history: the emancipation of women. Aside from Thurgood Marshall, no single American has so wholly advanced the cause of equality under the law." Jill Lepore, The New Yorker

~~~
Most importantly, remembering Amelia Earhart... 
 

00-AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAB3.jpg

Amelia Earhart, 1937 

"Amelia Earhart was interested in the status of women from an early age. She compiled a scrapbook about women who had nontraditional jobs, mainly in male dominated fields. She wanted women to achieve greater equality in the aviation industry. She persisted because she loved aviation and she also was passionate about achieving equality for women." Amelia Earhart's niece, Amy Kleppner [2018 Canary & Co interview]

  

 

00-AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAB3.jpg

Amelia Earhart
 

ZZAACJICRJOC4A1A.jpg

AAAorigirene4.jpg

Again, the original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile
looked nothing like Amelia Earhart. After
1940, Amelia virtually replaced her. Read
more about the original Irene below.

ZZZZZZIOC2ABC1ABC.jpg

The former Amelia Earhart in 1977, living
as Mrs. Irene (O'Crowley Craigmile) Bolam.
 
The original Irene O'Crowley Craigmile, who
Amelia Earhart had known, earned her pilot's
license in 1933, then gave birth to a son in 1934.
She did not frequent airfields as much after that, 
and her license was not renewed after 1937. What
became of the original Irene is a mystery unto itself.
Before 1940 arrived, a surrogate mother had already
been raising her 1934 born son for her, and her son
grew up believing she was his biological mother.
~~~
Below is the original Irene's son, Clarence Alvin "Larry" Heller's positive ID placement that he put in writing in 2014, as a contribution to Tod Swindell's forensic research and comparison analysis. Mr. Heller met twice with Tod Swindell in New York, and optioned his version of his mother's life story to him through the law firm of Cowan Liebowitz & Latman PC.   
 
 
 

 

The Positive ID Placement Made By Irene Craigmile Bolam's Son:

 

From Tod Swindell: Thursday, February 20, 2014
Subject: Verification

 

Hi Larry,

I want you to know that I am in full agreement with you that Amelia Earhart was not your mother. Your mother, as you identified her in these younger and older version photos, led a very different life than Amelia and bore little resemblance to her physically. Our agreement on this matter is pertinent to the correct presentation of the facts.  

My conveyance is that you have positively identified these images as those of your late mother, and that she absolutely was not, and never possibly could have been Amelia Earhart. I agree with this 100%, and understand that you do too. If you could you send back a simple ‘I agree’ for verification I’d appreciate it.

Thanks,

Tod

 

Clarence Alvin 'Larry' Heller: Friday, February 21, 2014
Subject: Re: Identity Verification

The attached pictures are of my mother and she was not Amelia Earhart. C. Heller   Proof is available.

origjunior.jpg
"AROUND 1940"

038.JPG
"1970s"


 
Now, take another look:

1

0000001IOC14to20.jpg

AAAorigirene4.jpg

2

origjunior.jpg